Excellent discussion and I agree, we need to talk more about it, much more. But be prepared to have your own ideas challenged about climate change. For the moniker is itself construed to deceive you. It's not a matter of the climate changing, it's a matter of pollution. If we considered it pollution, the problem could be easily solved. We can easily account for pollution. We cannot account for the climate changing. Yes it is a matter of changing our habits but go deeper - why are we still subsidizing fossil fuels? Why do "climate change" advocates still invest in those companies? Why does the UN and governments never (absolutely never) mention rapidly renewable alternatives such as hemp for manufacturing, or bamboo or kenaf? Hemp can be made into thousands of products and even used for building without ANY pollution while also sequestering CO2. Why is it never mentioned? I keep a teensy pollution footprint, but still nobody around me does and that's because our system is geared to pollute - it makes money for people - so keeping a teensy pollution footprint actually makes life very difficult. It would be easier if more people adopted such practices but nobody even cares to. The entire climate change precept is based on faulty and unscientific thinking, though we think it is scientific because science now spouts it. But why is science leaving so many crucial factors out, especially geoengineering? Surely this must have a huge impact on the heating of the atmosphere. And why leave out hemp when it is a plant that sequesters CO2 so brilliantly while also nourishing the soil?